Institute For Free Speech
Default Article

Political Spending: Civic Engagement is Not a Threat to Democracy
January 1, 2018  •  By IFS Staff  •    •  

The First Amendment guarantees every American freedom of speech. That freedom includes the right to spend money on speech. Without money, a political group cannot buy ads, print fliers, organize protests, or hire staff. Short of shouting one’s opinions on a street corner, it takes money to spread a message. Recognizing this relationship, the Supreme Court has long prohibited the…

Significant Constitutional and Practical Issues with Connecticut Senate Bill 1126 (as Substituted)
April 16, 2015   •  By Eric Wang   •  , , ,

This legislation would treat an expansive universe of activities having absolutely nothing to do with elections as potentially being coordinated spending with a candidate, ...

Significant Constitutional and Practical Issues with California Assembly Bill 1494
April 13, 2015   •  By Matt Nese   •  , ,

On behalf of the Center for Competitive Politics, I respectfully submit the following comments to highlight serious constitutional and practical problems presented by Assembly ...

Can elections be bought? – Analysing the relationship between money and success in political campaigns

 Default Article
April 1, 2015   •  By IFS Staff   •  ,

Abstract: Research on political science has been inconclusive in establishing whether political campaigns significantly influence electoral results. This study attempts to solve the dispute ...

Constitutional and Practical Issues with Montana Senate Bill 289
March 17, 2015   •  By Matt Nese   •  , , ,

On behalf of the Center for Competitive Politics, I am writing you today to respectfully submit the following comments regarding the constitutional and practical ...

Why Outside Spending Is Overrated: Lessons from the 2014 Senate Elections
February 19, 2015   •  By Luke Wachob   •  

The Koch brothers and their network of wealthy conservative donors recently announced that they intend to spend almost $900 million on the 2016 elections. ...

2015 Proxy Season: The Relentless Targeting of Political Speech Continues

 Default Article
January 29, 2015   •  By Joe Trotter   •  , , ,

The 2015 proxy season is underway and all indications suggest that it will be another record-breaking year for the number of proposals targeting companies ...

Fact versus Narrative

 Default Article
December 15, 2014   •  By Luke Wachob   •  

We were pleased to see The New York Times recently acknowledge that campaign spending in the 2014 election cycle declined from spending in the ...

Campaign Finance 101: Money Doesn’t Buy Votes

 Default Article
November 3, 2014   •  By Scott Blackburn   •  

Tomorrow is the midterm election, and, if tradition holds, Americans will be inundated Wednesday with countless newspaper stories indicating that this midterm is “the ...

Is "campaign finance reform" about good governance?

 Default Article
October 7, 2014   •  By Brad Smith   •  

From a recent announcement about an upcoming appearance by FEC Vice-Chair Ann Ravel, co-hosted by The League of Women Voters and RepresentUs.org, two groups that advocate ...

CPA Set to Release 2014 Index

 Default Article
September 23, 2014   •  By Joe Trotter   •  

The Center for Political Accountability (“CPA”), in partnership with the University of Pennsylvania’s Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research, is set to release its ...

Load more

Get the Latest Updates

© 2025 Institute for Free Speech | 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW | Suite 801 | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-301-3300

The word mark Institute for Free Speech® and its logo of a stylized lantern with a flame are federally registered service marks and are owned by the Institute for Free Speech.