Default Article

Political Spending: Civic Engagement is Not a Threat to Democracy

January 1, 2018  •  By IFS Staff  •    •  

The First Amendment guarantees every American freedom of speech. That freedom includes the right to spend money on speech. Without money, a political group cannot buy ads, print fliers, organize protests, or hire staff. Short of shouting one’s opinions on a street corner, it takes money to spread a message. Recognizing this relationship, the Supreme Court has long prohibited the…

Three Thoughts on the ABA’s Section 501(c)(4) Comments

Default Article
May 8, 2014   •  By Allen Dickerson   •  

Yesterday, the American Bar Association’s Taxation Section submitted comments on the IRS’s proposed regulations governing political activity by section 501(c)(4) organizations. As one would ...

Issue Analysis No. 7: Do Limits on Corporate and Union Giving to Candidates Lead to “Good” Government?

November 1, 2013   •  By Matt Nese   •  , ,

Since the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which freed corporations and labor unions to finance independent expenditures in support of federal candidates, the ...

Blatant Partisanship and Outright Misinformation: Public Citizen’s Press Conference

Default Article
October 31, 2013   •  By Joe Trotter   •  ,

Yesterday’s Public Citizen event calling for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to promulgate a rule forcing corporations to disclose their political spending was ...

A Non-Argument for Tearing Down the Wall between Church and State

Default Article
September 9, 2013   •  By Luke Wachob   •  

The LA Times says we need to break down the wall between church and state in order to save it. This Sunday, in a ...

Dismissing Voters

Default Article
September 3, 2013   •  By Luke Wachob   •  

In a recent interview with Bloomberg News, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg started up a chorus of that old familiar tune, “There’s Too ...

Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United (Part Five: Conclusions)

Default Article
July 24, 2013   •  By Tom Swanson   •  

The following post is adapted from my 2012 essay, “Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United.” It evaluates four major predictions, ...

Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United (Part Four: Foreign Takeover of American Elections?)

Default Article
July 21, 2013   •  By Tom Swanson   •  

The following post is adapted from my 2012 essay, “Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United.” It evaluates four major predictions, ...

Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United (Part Three: Republican Electoral Advantage?)

Default Article
July 17, 2013   •  By Tom Swanson   •  

The following post is adapted from my 2012 essay, “Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United.” It evaluates four major predictions, ...

Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United (Part Two: Corporate Spending Advantage?)

Default Article
July 14, 2013   •  By Tom Swanson   •  

The following post is adapted from my 2012 essay, “Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United.” It evaluates four major predictions, identified in ...

Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United (Part One: Independent Spending Increase?)

Default Article
July 10, 2013   •  By Tom Swanson   •  

The following post is adapted from my 2012 essay, “Spending and Amending: The Past and Future of Citizens United.” It evaluates four major predictions, ...

Load more