The First Amendment guarantees every American freedom of speech. That freedom includes the right to spend money on speech. Without money, a political group cannot buy ads, print fliers, organize protests, or hire staff. Short of shouting one’s opinions on a street corner, it takes money to spread a message. Recognizing this relationship, the Supreme Court has long prohibited the…
Note: An earlier version of this post incorrectly claimed that Walden Asset Management had submitted a proposal at Praxair, and that they encouraged shareholders ...
A piece in The New York Times today called “S.E.C. Gets Plea: Force Companies to Disclose Donations” is a good place to begin discussion ...
UPDATE: Public Citizen’s Taylor Lincoln, an author of the report, has provided a response to this post. In keeping with our high regard for ...
The federal suit, Carey et al v. FEC, asks the FEC to acknowledge what the courts have already decided: that any political action committee may ...
The Wall Street Journal published an interesting article last week about funding the Inauguration. Titled “Obama Considers Corporate Funding for Inauguration,” the article looks ...
Should we worry when money and politics mix? Common wisdom suggests that large campaign contributions can corrupt politicians and disenfranchise regular voters. However, Prof. ...
Prof. Bradley Smith illustrates some ways money is used in practice to ensure people have free speech. For example, money used to build a ...
The sexy new questions regarding money in politics — if the word sexy can ever really apply to an issue that breeds contentiousness rather ...
Using information obtained from the New York Times, Real Clear Politics, state websites, and the Center for Responsive Politics, we were able examine the ...
So…can we all just finally get on the same page that money in politics actually does equate to speech in politics? As the esteemed ...