Default Article

Political Spending: Civic Engagement is Not a Threat to Democracy

January 1, 2018  •  By IFS Staff  •    •  

The First Amendment guarantees every American freedom of speech. That freedom includes the right to spend money on speech. Without money, a political group cannot buy ads, print fliers, organize protests, or hire staff. Short of shouting one’s opinions on a street corner, it takes money to spread a message. Recognizing this relationship, the Supreme Court has long prohibited the…

When Do War Chests Deter?

January 1, 2005   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Do war chests deter challengers? And if so, under what circumstances do they deter? An anecdote reveals one circumstance when war chests may deter.

War Chests as Precautionary Savings

December 1, 2004   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

Conventional wisdom states that incumbents possess resources that prevent quality candidates from challenging them. This is a potential problem because quality challengers are more likely to ...

Did Firms Profit from Soft Money?

March 15, 2004   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

This paper uses event study methodology to measure whether firms that gave soft money to political parties received excessively high rates of returns from their ...

Pay to Play: Parties, Interests, and Money in Federal Elections

January 1, 2004   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

This chapter first appeared in The Medium and the Message:  Television Advertising and American Elections, edited by Kenneth Goldstein and Patricia Strach (Englewood Cliffs, ...

The Benefits of Campaign Spending

Default Article
September 4, 2003   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Critics of American politics often say that spending on electoral campaigns harms our democracy and charge that the money goes for cynical, negative, and ...

This Is Reform? Predicting the Impact of the New Campaign Financing Regulations

November 20, 2002   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

McCain-style campaign finance regulation is the new campaign reality. But what exactly will this reformist utopia look like? Assessing the “reformed” campaign of the future against the stated ...

Public Opinion and Campaign Finance: Reformers Versus Reality

October 1, 2002   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

I n the 2000 race for the presidency, Arizona senator John McCain promoted campaign finance reform as a partial remedy for widespread citizen cynicism toward politics. On ...

Why is there So Little Money in U.S. Politics?

June 10, 2002   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

Thirty years ago, Gordon Tullock posed a provocative puzzle: considering the value of public policies at stake and the reputed in°uence of campaign contributions in ...

The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House Elections

October 1, 2001   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

In this article, Jay Goodliffe challenges conventional wisdom on the effect of war chests in U.S. House elections. As many "reformers" suggest that war ...

It’s the Spending, Stupid: Understanding Campaign Finance in the Big-Government Era

July 1, 2001   •  By Matt Nese   •  ,

Proponents of new restrictions on campaign finance often argue that the United States spends too much money on campaigns and elections. That proposition is difficult to sustain ...

Load more