Daily Media Links 1/22: Four Years Later: Citizens United Has Created More Competitive Elections, Citizens United Four Years Later, `Free Speech’ or `Legalized Bribery’, Citizens United is 4, world inexplicably has not ended yet, and more…

January 22, 2014   •  By Matthew McIntyre   •  
Default Article

In the News

The Libertarian Republic: Four Years Later: Citizens United Has Created More Competitive Elections

By Joe Trotter

The Supreme Court’s decision overturned blatantly unconstitutional parts of a law designed to prevent freedom of association among individuals with the purpose of speaking out about politics. At its core, Citizens United was about whether the government could ban a nonprofit corporation, from distributing a movie about a political candidate.

The decision did not “reversed a century of law to open the floodgates – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections,” as President Barack Obama famously chastised the Supreme Court.  Rather, the decision allowed organizations to do what wealthy individuals have always been able to do: make independent expenditures advocating for or against a chosen candidate.

Read more…

Bloomberg: Citizens United Four Years Later, `Free Speech’ or `Legalized Bribery’

By MARK SILVA

The anniversary of the ruling also has inspired some creative commentary, including this web video from the Center for Competitive Politics, featuring a YouTube star of sorts, GoRemy: (On corporations as people, The AFL-CIO doesn’t have two arms, he notes. Nor does Citigroup have two eyes — though, actually it does have two I’s.) “Free speech” is good, he says on behalf of a group promoting the ruling as its guarantor.

Read more…

Hot Air: Video: Citizens United is 4, world inexplicably has not ended yet

By Mary Katharine Ham

Remember how bad the Citizens United decision was going to be for America? It was so bad no one would ever win an election fair and square again. It was so bad any ol’ billionaire could just buy any election he wanted. It was so bad it was worth President Obama calling out SCOTUS justices in an unprecedentedly rude move at the State of the Union.

Read more…

Politico: Citizens United, 4 years later

By Byron Tau

The ruling has helped reshape the campaign finance landscape by paving the way for megadonors and campaign consultants to wrest power away from the K Street fundraising circuit and the political parties, but just not in the way critics first envisioned.

“Citizens United has become the all-purpose boogeyman,” said Bradley Smith, an election law expert, founder of the Center for Competitive Politics and a noted skeptic of campaign finance restrictions. “Whatever you hate about campaigns, blame Citizens United.”

Tuesday is the anniversary of Citizens United, which comes as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on another major campaign finance case, McCutcheon v. FEC. In that case, justices will consider the constitutionality of the aggregate donation limits to political parties and candidates. A ruling in McCutcheon could come as early as Wednesday.

Read more…

CCP

5 Things You Didn’t Know About Citizens United

By Joe Trotter

Today the Center for Competitive Politics marked the fourth anniversary of theCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling by releasing a video about the decision by noted YouTube artist GoRemy.

The video examines five common misconceptions about the Citizens United that many critics of the decision tend to gloss over, such as the government’s argument that they should be able to ban books and that the decision did not create the concept of corporate personhood.

Read more…

Independent Groups

CPI: Hillary Clinton: the ‘Citizens United’ candidate

By Dave Levinthal

An oft-forgotten footnote to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision is that it all began with a low-budget film about Hillary Clinton.

Now today, on the fourth anniversary of Citizens United — a case that helped transmute the nation’s campaign financing system into one of unlimited spending and endless electioneering — Clinton may become its beneficiary-in-chief, poised to cash in like no other political candidate has before.

Consider that the Ready for Hillary super PAC has already raised millions of dollars from tens of thousands of donors and plans to transfer itsunparalleled resources to a future Clinton campaign machine. Another super PAC, the previously pro-Barack Obama Priorities USA Action that raised more than $79 million during the last election cycle, has begun transitioning into a Clinton shadow operation.

Read more…

Mother Jones: Meet the New Kochs: The DeVos Clan’s Plan to Defund the Left 

By Andy Kroll

THE DEVOSES sit alongside the Kochs, the Bradleys, and the Coorses as founding families of the modern conservative movement. Since 1970, DeVos family members have invested at least $200 million in a host of right-wing causes—think tanks, media outlets, political committees, evangelical outfits, and a string of advocacy groups. They have helped fund nearly every prominent Republican running for national office and underwritten a laundry list of conservative campaigns on issues ranging from charter schools and vouchers to anti-gay-marriage and anti-tax ballot measures. “There’s not a Republican president or presidential candidate in the last 50 years who hasn’t known the DeVoses,” says Saul Anuzis, a former chairman of the Michigan Republican Party.

Nowhere has the family made its presence felt as it has in Michigan, where it has given more than $44 million to the state party, GOP legislative committees, and Republican candidates since 1997. “It’s been a generational commitment,” Anuzis notes. “I can’t start to even think of who would’ve filled the void without the DeVoses there.”

The family fortune flows from 87-year-old Richard DeVos Sr. The son of poor Dutch immigrants, he cofounded the multilevel-marketing giant Amway with Jay Van Andel, a high school pal, in 1959. Five decades later, the company now sells $11 billion a year worth of cosmetics, vitamin supplements, kitchenware, air fresheners, and other household products. Amway has earned DeVos Sr. at least $6 billion; in 1991, he expanded his empire by buying the NBA’s Orlando Magic. The Koch brothers can usually expect Richard and his wife, Helen, to attend theirbiannual donor meetings. He is a lifelong Christian conservative and crusader for free markets and small government, values he passed down to his four children.

Read more…

National Journal: Hillary Clinton Super PAC Starting to Look More Like the Obama Machine

By Beth Reinhard

A groundswell of support, especially among women hungry to make history in 2016, fueled Ready for Hillary’s growth (70 percent of the donors are women). So did a recognition from longtime Clinton allies—who feared the group bestowed a potentially toxic whiff of inevitability—that the PAC could pose an even bigger liability if it didn’t succeed. The decision by a handful of Obama’s top operatives to join the bandwagon reflects the overwhelming perception within the Democratic establishment that Clinton will be the next nominee.

“She’s the only candidate from either party that could lay the kind of groundwork that we’re seeking,” said Mitch Stewart, a top Obama strategist who is helping Ready for Hillary boost its online presence and connect with critical voter constituencies. “Not to take advantage of that enthusiasm would be gross malpractice.”

Read more…

Lobbying and Ethics

Reuters: Obama lobbying ban faces setback in court

By ANDY SULLIVAN

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama’s attempt to minimize the influence of “special interests” on his administration received a setback on Friday when a U.S. judge reinstated a lawsuit challenging his ban on lobbyists serving on government advisory boards.

The ruling amounts to a partial victory for Washington’s 12,000 registered lobbyists, many of whom feel they have been unfairly tarred by Obama’s efforts to keep them out of public service.

At issue is whether registered lobbyists can serve on the 1,000 or so advisory committees that help the federal government shape policy on everything from nuclear waste to housing. Obama banned lobbyists from serving on such boards in 2010, arguing in a memorandum that “special interests” had “drowned out the voices of ordinary Americans.”

Read more…

FEC

AP: Federal Election Commission Says Former Idaho Sen. Larry Craig Spent Money Illegally

Federal Election Commission lawyers urged a federal judge not to heed U.S. Sen. Larry Craig’s contention that regulators are being too hard on him and force him to pay nearly $360,000 in fines and restitution for tapping campaign accounts for his legal defense following his 2007 arrest in an airport bathroom sex sting.  

Read more…

State and Local

New York –– New York Daily News: EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Michael Grimm may have used ‘donor swapping’ to skirt fundraising limits

By Dan Friedman

The swapping works like this: A donor gives the maximum to Candidate A donates to Candidate B — and in return, a donor or friend of Candidate B gives an identical amount to Candidate A.

A Daily News review of 2010 federal fundraising records found more than 20 transactions that suggest supporters of Grimm and candidates in California, South Dakota, Illinois and Virginia swapped donations totalling more than $75,000.

Read more…

Utah –– KUTV: Utah Senator Calling For Campaign Finance Reform 

A special investigator hired by the Utah House of Representatives said the campaign organization for former Utah Attorney General John Swallow misused campaign funds. Swallow stepped down last month, amidst allegations of bribery and other charges, while denying any wrongdoing.

“These lobbyists – people that have contracts with the state of Utah – can go up and say, ‘Thank you so much for the good job you’re doing, Governor,’ and hand a check – and do hand a check – for 10, 20, 30, 50  thousand dollars,” Dabakis said. “And to pretend that that has no effect, that’s like in John Swallowville. It’s not accepting the reality.”

Dabakis is proposing a $10,000 cap for campaign contributions for each organization or individual to go toward the candidates for statewide public offices and $5,000 for state legislators’ campaigns.

Read more…

Virginia –– Washington Post: Former Va. Gov. McDonnell and wife charged in gifts case 

By Rosalind S. Helderman, Carol D. Leonnig and Sari Horwitz

Former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell and his wife, Maureen, were charged Tuesday with illegally accepting gifts, luxury vacations and large loans from a wealthy Richmond-area businessman who sought special treatment from state government.

Authorities alleged that for nearly two years, the McDonnells hit up executive Jonnie R. Williams Sr. again and again, lodging near constant requests for large loans, clothes, trips, golf accessories and private plane rides.

Read more…

Matthew McIntyre

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap